Claims

Legal and technical issues are described as the main challenges of developing and using virtual patients

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The literature mainly mentions legal challenges such as rights, permissions and copyright, and technical challenges such as hardware and software management, technology support and unreliable internet connection. → Hege Inga 2016

Evidence

Hege Inga 2016

Hege Inga, Kononowicz Andrzej A., Tolks Daniel, Edelbring Samuel, Kuehlmeyer Katja. (2016). A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative content analysis of VP descriptions. The Challenges subcategory reports "mainly legal and technical challenges were mentioned", with legal issues including "management of rights, permissions, and copyright issues" and technical issues such as unreliable internet connection and cross-platform compatibility.

"Concerning the challenges of developing and using VPs, mainly legal and technical challenges were mentioned. Legal issues included management of rights, permissions, and copyright issues"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.