Claims

Immersive VR assessments of nursing and medical students are concentrated in settings that are difficult to replicate, especially emergencies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fourteen of 26 included studies (54%) examined emergency settings, including five on pediatric emergencies and one on prehospital mass casualty triage. → Neher Andrea N. 2025

Evidence

Neher Andrea N. 2025

Neher Andrea N., Bühlmann Florian, Müller Martin, Berendonk Christoph, Sauter Thomas C., Birrenbach Tanja. (2025). Virtual reality for assessment in undergraduate nursing and medical education – a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06867-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of 26 studies of HMD VR assessment in nursing and medical education. The review reports that "Fourteen studies (54%) examined emergency settings", including five on pediatric emergencies and one on prehospital mass casualty incidents.

"Fourteen studies (54%) examined emergency settings [25, 26, 28–30, 35, 45, 46], including five (19%) that focused on pediatric emergencies [11, 31, 40, 41, 47] and one on prehospital emergencies with mass casualty incidents [34]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.