Claims

Interprofessional mass casualty incident simulation increased disaster-response confidence in 96% of participating pre-licensed nursing students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most participating students (96%) indicated that the mass casualty incident simulation increased their confidence in responding to a disaster, with an overall event rating of 94.25% (n = 40). → Hobenu Kafui A. 2025

Evidence

Hobenu Kafui A. 2025

Hobenu Kafui A., Adefuye Anthonio O., Naab Florence, Nyoni Champion N. (2025). Strategies to enhance clinical teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305789

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Strout et al.'s interprofessional mass casualty incident simulation for pre-licensed nursing students, where "Most participating students (96%)" reported increased confidence and the overall event rating was 94.25% (n = 40). These are descriptive percentages.

"Most participating students (96%) indicated that the simulation increased their confidence in responding to a disaster. All participants' overall event rating (n = 40) was 94.25%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.