Claims

Visual-only text also yields higher comprehension than audio-visual text in immersive VR

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Participants in the visual-only condition scored significantly higher on comprehension than those in the audio-visual condition. → Patrick Albus 2023

Evidence

Patrick Albus 2023

Patrick Albus, Tina Seufert. (2023). The modality effect reverses in a virtual reality learning environment and influences cognitive load. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09611-7

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

ANCOVA on comprehension in the same VR modality experiment, controlling for prior knowledge, which had a significant impact on comprehension (ηp² = 0.37). The visual-only condition scored significantly higher, ηp² = 0.09.

"comprehension (H2: F(1,58) = 5.74, p = .01, ηp2=0.09)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id vr-reverse-modality-effect-comprehension
title Visual-only text also yields higher comprehension than audio-visual text in immersive VR
description Visual-only text also yields higher comprehension than audio-visual text in immersive VR
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patrick-albus-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.