VR simulation studies with control groups showed decreased surgical time when training with a VR simulator¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the VR studies that compared a control group, training with a VR simulator was associated with decreased surgical time. → Joseph Fredrick J. 2023
Evidence¶
Joseph Fredrick J. 2023¶
Joseph Fredrick J., Vanluchene Hanne E. R., Bervini David. (2023). Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery—a systematic review. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01995-5
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's discussion attributes this to three cited VR studies (Steineke & Barbery 2021; Chugh et al. 2017; Bambakidis et al. 2013) that compared a control group using conventional presurgical planning with a VR group. The review reports the finding without a pooled effect size.
"The VR studies that compared a control group showed decreased surgical time when training with a VR simulator [20, 24, 28]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Spaced VR simulator training yields better performance and faster skill acquisition than massed training for surgical psychomotor skills — related
- Virtual reality simulation training is associated with safer cataract surgery outcomes than supervised surgical training on actual patients alone — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.