Virtual reality training improves economy-of-movement and error global rating scores compared with no additional training in one RCT¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? One RCT found the VR group had significantly greater improvement in economy of movement (P = 0.003) and error (P = 0.003) GRSs compared with the control group. → Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B 2022
Evidence¶
Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B 2022¶
Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B. (2022). The impact of virtual reality simulation training on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac086
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Single-centre RCT randomizing 20 participants to VR training or no additional training, assessed in the operating theatre pre- and post-intervention using the authors' five-domain GRS with eight participants analysed per arm; "economy of movement (P = 0.003) and error (P = 0.003)". The article notes only part of the procedure was assessed, excluding dissection of the hepatocystic triangle.
"This study found that the VR group had significantly greater improvement in their economy of movement (P = 0.003) and error (P = 0.003) GRSs compared with the control group39"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- VR-trained and bench-top-trained subjects showed no objective performance difference but a significant GRS difference on a final VR simulator assessment — related
- Virtual reality training improves OSATS scores compared with no additional training for junior trainees in laparoscopic cholecystectomy — related
- Virtual reality training reduces intraoperative error counts compared with no additional training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy — related
- Virtual reality training reduces time to completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy tasks compared with no additional training — related
- Virtual reality training shows no significant improvement in total GOALS scores or GOALS domains compared with no additional training — related
- No significant differences found between virtual reality training and simulation training in GOALS scores or time to completion — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.