Virtual reality training reduces time to completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy tasks compared with no additional training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Meta-analysis of eight RCTs found time to completion of task significantly shorter after VR training than after no additional training (MD −8.35 min, P < 0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 52 per cent). → Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B 2022
Evidence¶
Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B 2022¶
Humm Gemma; Mohan Helen Peter; Fleming Christina; Harries Rhiannon; Wood Christopher; Dawas Khaled; Stoyanov Danail; Lovat Laurence B. (2022). The impact of virtual reality simulation training on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac086
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of eight RCTs comparing VR training with no additional training on time to completion of task, 115 participants randomized to VRT and 102 to NAT, random-effects model, "MD=−8.35 min, 95 per cent c.i. 13.10 to 3.60, P = <0.001". No effect size printed.
"In a meta-analysis of eight studies8,33,37–39,42,44,50, 115 participants were randomized to VR training and 102 to NAT. Statistical heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 52%). Using a random-effects model, the combined weighted effect favoured VRT (MD=−8.35 min, 95 per cent c.i. 13.10 to 3.60, P = <0.001)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Virtual reality training improves economy-of-movement and error global rating scores compared with no additional training in one RCT — related
- Virtual reality training improves OSATS scores compared with no additional training for junior trainees in laparoscopic cholecystectomy — related
- Virtual reality training shows no significant improvement in total GOALS scores or GOALS domains compared with no additional training — related
- Virtual reality training reduces intraoperative error counts compared with no additional training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy — related
- No significant differences found between virtual reality training and simulation training in GOALS scores or time to completion — related
- Simulation-based training reduces intraoperative errors in laparoscopic surgery — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.