Claims

The report attributes to Glaser et al. (1985) that skilled and less skilled avionics technicians generated plans equally often but differed in plan quality, with experts deploying domain-particularized strong methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Higher and lower skill subjects were equally planful in a verbal troubleshooting task; differences emerged only in the utility of plans, with less skilled subjects lacking domain-particularized strong methods. → Ellen P. Hall 1995

Evidence

Ellen P. Hall 1995

Ellen P. Hall, Sherrie P. Gott, Robert A. Pokorny. (1995). A Procedural Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis: The PARI Methodology. Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate, Brooks AFB, Texas. AL/HR-TR-1995-0108. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada303654

q2 · i? · design · r2

The report attributes this to Glaser et al. (1985), who examined plan generation by skilled and less skilled avionics technicians in a verbal troubleshooting task and found the two groups "did not differ with respect to the frequency of plan generation." The report quotes that less skilled subjects "are way behind on stronger problem-solving methods, methods particularized to the specific technical domain." No effect sizes are printed.

"Both higher and lower skill subjects were planful. The differences arise only when the utility of the plan for solving the problem is considered."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id weak-methods-shared-strong-methods-expert-only
title The report attributes to Glaser et al. (1985) that skilled and less skilled avionics technicians generated plans equally often but differed in plan quality, with experts deploying domain-particularized strong methods
description The report attributes to Glaser et al.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1995
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ellen-p-hall-1995

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.