Five non-programmers authoring with final Web xPST produced 74 effective statistics tutors in a month, with coding a small share of total authoring time¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The five authors averaged 28.57 h total logged time but only 7.37 h editing the xPST Instruction File across the month. → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015
q2 i? All 74 authored models met the minimum tutoring quality (score 3 or higher). → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Stephen B. Gilbert 2015¶
Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0
q2 · i? · design · r2
Case study of five authors (two instructors, three undergraduates) building a college statistics tutor using JotForm and Web xPST. The quote separates total time from "7.37 h editing the xPST Instruction File".
"Authors averaged 28.57 h logged on to the system across the month for the total time (with a range of 18.45 to 36.85 h), and a mean of 7.37 h editing the xPST Instruction File (a range of 4.87 to 9.48 h)."
Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)¶
Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0
q2 · i? · design · r2
Quality assessment of all 74 problems authored in the same month-long case study, scored with the Table 2 rubric; the quote states all models met the minimum for tutoring.
"All 74 of the models were deemed to meet the minimum needed in order to provide tutoring"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks — related
- In a head-to-head comparison, xPST and CTAT both let non-programmers create high-caliber tutors, with no significant time differences by the third problem — related
- Students tutored by an xPST-created web statistics tutor (xSTAT) scored higher on exam transfer problems than untutored students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
web-xpst-authoring-productivity-study |
title |
Five non-programmers authoring with final Web xPST produced 74 effective statistics tutors in a month, with coding a small share of total authoring time |
description |
Five non-programmers authoring with final Web xPST produced 74 effective statistics tutors in a month, with coding a small share of total authoring time |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — stephen-b-gilbert-2015, stephen-b-gilbert-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.