Claims

Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 10 participants produced 26 tutors, of which 18 (69%) scored 4 or 5 on a 5-point quality rubric and only 1 was deficient. → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 q2 i? Average authoring time fell from 5.1 h for Task A to 2.5 h for Task B and 1.7 h for Task C. → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)

Evidence

Stephen B. Gilbert 2015

Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0

q2 · i? · design · r2

Course-assignment study in an HCI graduate class: ten non-programmers, given a worked example and brief videos, each authored three tutors for ACM Portal search tasks, scored on a 5-point rubric. "Eighteen (69 %) received a score of either 4 or 5".

"Eighteen (69 %) received a score of either 4 or 5, indicating that the tutor went above the minimum needed to scaffold the learner through the task."

Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)

Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0

q2 · i? · design · r2

System-tracked timing in the same study, including time spent on learning materials; the quote shows declining time on task across the three successively authored tutors.

"we found that the time on task decreased as the participants moved from task to task: the average time to author Task A was 5.1 h, for Task B 2.5 h, and for Task C 1.7 h."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id web-xpst-nonprogrammers-author-successfully
title Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks
description Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — stephen-b-gilbert-2015, stephen-b-gilbert-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.