Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The 10 participants produced 26 tutors, of which 18 (69%) scored 4 or 5 on a 5-point quality rubric and only 1 was deficient. → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015
q2 i? Average authoring time fell from 5.1 h for Task A to 2.5 h for Task B and 1.7 h for Task C. → Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Stephen B. Gilbert 2015¶
Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0
q2 · i? · design · r2
Course-assignment study in an HCI graduate class: ten non-programmers, given a worked example and brief videos, each authored three tutors for ACM Portal search tasks, scored on a 5-point rubric. "Eighteen (69 %) received a score of either 4 or 5".
"Eighteen (69 %) received a score of either 4 or 5, indicating that the tutor went above the minimum needed to scaffold the learner through the task."
Stephen B. Gilbert 2015 (2)¶
Stephen B. Gilbert, Stephen B. Blessing, Enruo Guo. (2015). Authoring Effective Embedded Tutors: An Overview of the Extensible Problem Specific Tutor (xPST) System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:428–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0045-0
q2 · i? · design · r2
System-tracked timing in the same study, including time spent on learning materials; the quote shows declining time on task across the three successively authored tutors.
"we found that the time on task decreased as the participants moved from task to task: the average time to author Task A was 5.1 h, for Task B 2.5 h, and for Task C 1.7 h."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Five non-programmers authoring with final Web xPST produced 74 effective statistics tutors in a month, with coding a small share of total authoring time — related
- In a head-to-head comparison, xPST and CTAT both let non-programmers create high-caliber tutors, with no significant time differences by the third problem — related
- Students tutored by an xPST-created web statistics tutor (xSTAT) scored higher on exam transfer problems than untutored students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
web-xpst-nonprogrammers-author-successfully |
title |
Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks |
description |
Ten non-programmer graduate students quickly learned early Web xPST and produced mostly high-quality tutors, with authoring time dropping across successive tasks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — stephen-b-gilbert-2015, stephen-b-gilbert-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.