Claims

WebQuest instruction shows no significant immediate effect on ninth-grade mathematics achievement at posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Immediately after the treatment, experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the achievement test. → Yenmez 2017

Evidence

Yenmez 2017

Yenmez, A. A., Özpinar, İ., & Gökçe, S. (2017). Use of WebQuests in Mathematics Instruction: Academic Achievement, Teacher and Student Opinions. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(9). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050913

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test on posttest scores of the 39-student experimental and 39-student control groups after the four-week treatment. The experimental mean (70.9) was descriptively higher than the control mean (67.7), but "no statistically significant mean difference" was found (t(76)=0.884, p=.379).

"However, independent samples t-test results of posttest indicate that there is no statistically significant mean difference between the groups as shown in Table 3 (t (76) = 0,884, p>,05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.