Claims

Exclusive use of white manikins heightened CALD students' sense of underrepresentation in SBL

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Use of white manikins and white-patient scenarios heightened students' sense of underrepresentation during SBL. → Zhang Luocheng 2025

Evidence

Zhang Luocheng 2025

Zhang Luocheng, Patterson Freyr, Penman Adriana, Forbes Roma. (2025). Understanding simulation-based learning for health professions students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: a scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10384-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Graham & Atz (2015), that exclusive use of white manikins and white-patient scenarios did not accurately simulate assessment of patients of colour, and "heightened their sense of underrepresentation during SBL experiences".

"Furthermore, students reported that the use of white manikins heightened their sense of underrepresentation during SBL experiences (Graham & Atz, 2015)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.