Claims

Both experimental and control groups improved significantly from initial test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Grades averages at initial test and post-test differed significantly within the experimental focus group (t=-19.716; df=83; p<0.001) and within the control focus group (t=-14.401; df=80; p<0.001). → Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Evidence

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş. (2017). The Role of Independent Activities in Development of Strategic Learning Competences and Increase of School Performance Level, within the Study of High School Pedagogy. Educatia 21 Journal, (15). https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2017.15.07

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t tests on initial versus post-test grades: experimental group rose from 4.21 to 7.33 and control group from 4.19 to 5.92, both significant per the printed statistics.

"We determined that the grades average at both tests was significantly different, both for the experimental focus group (t=-19.716; df=83; p<0.001), as for the control focus group (t=-14.401; df=80; p<0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.