Both experimental and control groups improved significantly from initial test to post-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Grades averages at initial test and post-test differed significantly within the experimental focus group (t=-19.716; df=83; p<0.001) and within the control focus group (t=-14.401; df=80; p<0.001). → Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017
Evidence¶
Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017¶
Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş. (2017). The Role of Independent Activities in Development of Strategic Learning Competences and Increase of School Performance Level, within the Study of High School Pedagogy. Educatia 21 Journal, (15). https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2017.15.07
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired t tests on initial versus post-test grades: experimental group rose from 4.21 to 7.33 and control group from 4.19 to 5.92, both significant per the printed statistics.
"We determined that the grades average at both tests was significantly different, both for the experimental focus group (t=-19.716; df=83; p<0.001), as for the control focus group (t=-14.401; df=80; p<0.001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.