Claims

Experimental-group learning achievement improved significantly from before to after the three-week practical materials instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's learning achievement after the experiment was significantly improved compared with before, reaching the 0.01 level (t = 6.841). → Chen 2010

Evidence

Chen 2010

Su-Chang Chen, National Penghu University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. (2010). Instructional Experiment Of Practical Competencies-Oriented Teaching Materials In Technical Universities. American Journal of Business Education – September 2010 Volume 3, Number 9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1058552

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group t test for the 31 experimental students: learning achievement rose from M = 23.548 (SD 6.824) before to M = 39.371 (SD 10.921) after, t = 6.841, p = 0.000, as printed in Table 3.

"According to Table 3 and t test, the learning achievement of the experimental group after the experiment has significantly improved and it reaches significance level (0.01)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.