Claims

Both groups improved vocabulary retention from pre-test to post-test, with a larger gain in the PowerPoint group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's vocabulary retention improved significantly from pre-test to post-test. → Nam and Trinh 2012 q2 i? The experimental group's vocabulary retention improved significantly from pre-test to post-test. → Nam and Trinh 2012 (2)

Evidence

Nam and Trinh 2012

Ta Thanh Nam & Lap Q. Trinh. (2012). PowerPoint as a potential tool to learners' vocabulary retention: Empirical evidences from a Vietnamese secondary education setting. li-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 2 No. 4, October - December. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070209

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test within the control group (n = 34) comparing pre-test (M = 6.82) and post-test (M = 7.53) vocabulary retention; the article reports the mean difference was "statistically significant".

"Besides, this mean difference (MD = -0.71) was statistically significant (t = -3.35, df = 33, p = .002)."

Nam and Trinh 2012 (2)

Ta Thanh Nam & Lap Q. Trinh. (2012). PowerPoint as a potential tool to learners' vocabulary retention: Empirical evidences from a Vietnamese secondary education setting. li-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 2 No. 4, October - December. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070209

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test within the experimental group (n = 34) comparing pre-test (M = 6.87) and post-test (M = 8.92) vocabulary retention; the article reports the mean difference was "statistically significant".

"In addition, the Paired Samples T-Test gives statistical evidences that this mean difference (MD = -2.05) was statistically significant (t = -14.31, df = 33, p = .00)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.