The amount of feedback given for a specific word correlated positively with the number of correct responses to its post-test item¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Across the 25 target words, the amount of feedback given for a word showed a positive Pearson correlation with correct responses to its corresponding post-test item (r = .594). → Nowbakht and Shahnazari 2015

Evidence¶

Nowbakht and Shahnazari 2015¶

Mohammad Nowbakht, Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari. (2015). The Comparative Effects of Comprehensible Input, Output and Corrective Feedback on the Receptive Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary Items. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.103

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pearson correlation across the 25 target words between feedback given for each word during treatment and correct responses to its post-test item; the effect size was r = .594, significant at the 0.01 level (p = .002).

"Pearson Correlation 1 .594** Sig. (2-tailed) .002 N 25 25"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The authors interpret corrective feedback, rather than output production alone, as the factor most responsible for the experimental group's improved receptive vocabulary performance — related
• The amount of corrective feedback an individual learner received correlated positively with that learner's post-test performance — related
• Reliable dynamic-video social feedback produces more widespread cortical activation, better positive/negative feedback differentiation, and greater impact on word learning than symbolic feedback — related