Claims

Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 review r1–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For novice learners, instruction relying more heavily on studying worked examples than on problem solving yields better learning outcomes with less time and effort during acquisition. → Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel 2010

q2 i? For novice learners, studying worked examples facilitates learning and transfer better than conventional problem solving and is often more efficient in time or mental effort. → Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2010

Evidence

Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel 2010

Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel. (2010). Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

A narrative review synthesizing worked-example experiments, mostly with highly structured tasks in domains such as algebra, statistics, geometry, and physics. The review attributes the effect to worked examples preventing weak means-ends analysis, stating that better outcomes are "often reached with less investment of time and effort during acquisition".

"Research on studying worked examples has consistently shown that for novice learners, instruction that relies more heavily on studying worked examples than on problem solving is more effective for learning, as well as more efficient in that better learning outcomes are often reached with less investment of time and effort during acquisition"

Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2010

Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Advances in Research on Worked Examples, Animations, and Cognitive Load Measurement. Educ Psychol Rev (2010) 22:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9145-4

q2 · i? · review · r1

Narrative review reporting the accumulated worked-example research, citing Cooper and Sweller 1987, Paas 1992, Sweller and Cooper 1985 among others. The review states worked examples are "more effective in facilitating learning and transfer compared to conventional problem solving"; no effect sizes are printed.

"An impressive body of research over the last few decades has shown that for novice learners, worked examples are more effective in facilitating learning and transfer compared to conventional problem solving, and are often more efficient in their requirements of time or mental effort"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id worked-example-effect-novices-review
aliases worked-example-effect-review-2010
title Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect)
description Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
source_checked 2026-10-21
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — tamara-van-gog-nikol-rummel-2010, tamara-van-gog-fred-paas-john-sweller-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.