Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 reviewr1–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? For novice learners, instruction relying more heavily on studying worked examples than on problem solving yields better learning outcomes with less time and effort during acquisition. → Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel 2010
q2 i? For novice learners, studying worked examples facilitates learning and transfer better than conventional problem solving and is often more efficient in time or mental effort. → Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2010
Evidence¶
Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel 2010¶
Tamara van Gog & Nikol Rummel. (2010). Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7
q2 · i? · review · r3
A narrative review synthesizing worked-example experiments, mostly with highly structured tasks in domains such as algebra, statistics, geometry, and physics. The review attributes the effect to worked examples preventing weak means-ends analysis, stating that better outcomes are "often reached with less investment of time and effort during acquisition".
"Research on studying worked examples has consistently shown that for novice learners, instruction that relies more heavily on studying worked examples than on problem solving is more effective for learning, as well as more efficient in that better learning outcomes are often reached with less investment of time and effort during acquisition"
Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2010¶
Tamara van Gog & Fred Paas & John Sweller. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Advances in Research on Worked Examples, Animations, and Cognitive Load Measurement. Educ Psychol Rev (2010) 22:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9145-4
q2 · i? · review · r1
Narrative review reporting the accumulated worked-example research, citing Cooper and Sweller 1987, Paas 1992, Sweller and Cooper 1985 among others. The review states worked examples are "more effective in facilitating learning and transfer compared to conventional problem solving"; no effect sizes are printed.
"An impressive body of research over the last few decades has shown that for novice learners, worked examples are more effective in facilitating learning and transfer compared to conventional problem solving, and are often more efficient in their requirements of time or mental effort"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Worked examples reduce unnecessary search for novices. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Minimal guidance is less effective for novices than explicit instruction — a broader claim this one bears on
- Example-based sequences outperform problem-only practice for novices, and fading support is argued to aid transfer — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Self-explanation beats unguided studying for equal time, but instructional explanations, problem solving and retrieval practice can be equally or more effective — related
- Productive Failure Improves Conceptual Learning — reports the opposite
- Cognitive Overload Degrades Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- General problem-solving heuristics used in controlled conscious problem solving are biologically secondary skills requiring explicit learning — related
- Example-first conditions outperformed problem-first conditions on an immediate circuit test — related
- The argument that retrieval practice effects do not occur with materials high in element interactivity is contested, and the chapter judges its research base not convincing — related
- Studying solved problems improves algebra achievement compared to solving practice problems alone, though the evidence base is rated minimal and one study found negative effects — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Worked examples benefit learning even compared to tutored problem solving with on-demand guidance, indicating the effect is not an artefact of weak control conditions — related
- Solving practice problems invested less mental effort than contrasting or erroneous examples, contrary to the worked-example-effect hypothesis — reports the opposite
- Split-attention worked examples lose their advantage over conventional practice, while integrated formats restore it — related
- Worked examples are studied for their effects on cognitive load in older learners (per Van Gerven, Paas, & Schmidt) — related
- Worked examples result in better performance than conventional problem solving with no guidance, per prior work cited in the thesis — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
worked-example-effect-novices-review |
aliases |
worked-example-effect-review-2010 |
title |
Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect) |
description |
Studying worked examples is more effective and more efficient than problem solving for novice learners (the worked example effect) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
source_checked |
2026-10-21 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — tamara-van-gog-nikol-rummel-2010, tamara-van-gog-fred-paas-john-sweller-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.