Youth workers at the treatment program treated admissions as a sudden procedural event rather than a gradual therapeutic process¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 1998: local conditions change quickly
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 4 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i? At the Youth Center, the identified problem was Workers treating admissions as a sudden, procedural event instead of easing youths gradually into residential treatment. → Williams 1995

Evidence¶

Williams 1995¶

Williams, Paul A. (1995). Developing a Model to Ease Youths' Transitions into Residential Treatment: Integrating Constructivist Therapies and Youth Care Work into a Contextually Relevant Rite of Passage. Nova Southeastern University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED398498

q2 · i? · design · r2

Applied research project documenting the problem through interviews with administrators, workers, and youths, workers' written statements, and the admission and intake manual at one residential treatment program. The author states the problem is "Workers treating admissions as a sudden, procedural event."

"Importantly, the problem I have identified is one of Workers treating admissions as a sudden, procedural event."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Workers and administrators who were presented with the CMR model viewed it as a comfortable transition into residential treatment — related
• School turnaround is a gradual process rather than an immediate event triggered by replacing staff or leadership