Working in a team changed significantly in the experimental groups, with learners who worked only individually within the team dropping sharply¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Working in a team changed significantly in the 1st and 2nd experimental groups; learners who worked hard within the team fell to 5% in the 1st experimental group by the end, from a baseline indistinguishable from the control group (30% vs 32%). → NataÔja van Gejeka 2013

Evidence¶

NataÔja van Gejeka 2013¶

NataÔja van Gejeka. (2013). Research into Learning Process in a Vocational Secondary School in the Context of Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2013-0012

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Structured observation percentages for the working-in-a-team criterion in Table 3, before and after the semester-long experiment. The article prints the 5% end figure and the 30% and 32% baseline figures; no standardised effect size is printed.

"At the end of the experiment, the learners who work hard within the team remained only 5% in the 1st experimental group (at the beginning of the experiment the 1st experimental and the control groups are not essentially distinguishable ñ 30% and 32% of the learners who hard work within the team)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Collaboration — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Business communication increased substantially in both experimental groups during the experiment — related
• At the beginning of the experiment the experimental and control groups showed no significant differences in integrative collaboration — related
• Creative action increased in both experimental groups, with learners working creatively only fragmentally rising sharply — related