At the beginning of the experiment the experimental and control groups showed no significant differences in integrative collaboration¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Baseline chi-square tests found no significant differences between either experimental group and the control group (p>0,05). → NataÔja van Gejeka 2013

Evidence¶

NataÔja van Gejeka 2013¶

NataÔja van Gejeka. (2013). Research into Learning Process in a Vocational Secondary School in the Context of Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2013-0012

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Baseline structured observation (160 minutes) before the semester-long experiment; chi-square tests compared the 1st and 2nd experimental groups with the control group. The article reports "no differences" at p>0,05; equivalence was not formally tested and no effect size is printed.

"As seen in Table 3 and Table 4, at the beginning of the experiment, no differences between the 1st experimental group and the control group ( chi-square tests, p>0,05) are seen"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• After critical reading instruction, the experimental group preferred reviewing over summarizing an ironical text while the control group did not — related
• The experimental and control groups were homogeneous in teaching methods achievement at the start of the experiment — a broader claim this one bears on
• The three groups were equivalent in self-regulated and self-directed learning scores before treatment — a broader claim this one bears on
• Before the intervention, the control and experimental groups were statistically equivalent in geometric thinking — a broader claim this one bears on
• Both groups began the study with a positive attitude toward reading and maintained it, with no group difference — related
• Working in a team changed significantly in the experimental groups, with learners who worked only individually within the team dropping sharply — related