Under the components model in ECLS-K, working memory is the most closely associated EF component with math, but only at time point 1 does it show a positive residual correlation beyond latent EF¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Model 2 for the ECLS-K, working memory βs=0.44–0.46 exceeded inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, yet its residual correlation with math beyond latent EF was significant only at time point 1. → Nguyen 2019
Evidence¶
Nguyen 2019¶
Nguyen, T., Duncan, R.J., & Bailey, D.H. (2019). Theoretical and methodological implications of associations between executive function and mathematics in early childhood. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.04.002
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Path estimates from Model 2 estimated on ECLS-K raw data at three waves (Table 6). The article reports working memory "βs=0.44–0.46" and no clear residual-correlation pattern across meta-analytic studies.
"Model 2 showed that working memory was the most closely associated component of EF, βs=0.44–0.46, although only time point 1 found working memory to have a positive residual correlation beyond the latent EF factor."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Working Memory — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Executive Function — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Children's executive function at the beginning of pre-kindergarten predicts growth in mathematics achievement across the pre-kindergarten year — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- In the ECLS-K: 2010 dataset, a single latent EF factor model fits EF–math associations better than a specific-components model at all three time points — related
- Math achievement correlates more strongly with EF components than EF components correlate with each other in early childhood — related
- In a meta-analytic database of ten studies, the latent EF factor model was preferred in seven samples, with two favoring the components model and one equal — related
- Preschool executive function positively predicts kindergarten math on both measures, while teacher–child relationship quality shows only a trend-level main effect on ECLS-K Math and none on Applied Problems — related
- Executive function at 48 months moderates the preschool-to-kindergarten development of math ability on the ECLS-K Math battery but not the Applied Problems subtest — related
- Preschool math ability significantly predicts kindergarten math ability on both the ECLS-K Math battery and the Applied Problems subtest — related
- Improvement during practice is highly variable across functions and stages, with final abilities in different functions correlating only about 0.4 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
working-memory-strongest-component-association-ecls-k |
title |
Under the components model in ECLS-K, working memory is the most closely associated EF component with math, but only at time point 1 does it show a positive residual correlation beyond latent EF |
description |
Under the components model in ECLS-K, working memory is the most closely associated EF component with math, but only at time point 1 does it show a positive residual correlation beyond latent EF |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nguyen-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.