In WOZ I, students reported the cognitive-model-based wizard feedback as helpful for understanding and solving robotics problems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across the three WOZ I interventions, students formulated 28 statements coding the feedback as helpful versus 3 statements coding it as not helpful. → Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart 2023
Evidence¶
Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart 2023¶
Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart. (2023). Towards a Tutoring System to Support Robotics Activities in Classrooms – Two Wizard-of-Oz Studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00305-2
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Qualitative content analysis of paired student interviews after the three intervention lessons of the WOZ I classroom study, with 14 students working in pairs and statements coded by the first author. Students formulated “28 statements in the category “feedback was helpful”” against 3 not-helpful statements.
"In all, the students formulated 28 statements in the category “feedback was helpful” and 3 statements in the category “feedback was not helpful”."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the first WOZ I intervention, students' problems lay mostly in the software category, especially the programming environment — related
- WOZ I wizards judged the four-layer cognitive model appropriate for supporting students during robotics tasks — related
- WOZ I showed a descriptive pre-to-post improvement in students' programming ability, with no statistical significance calculated — related
- In the hidden-wizard WOZ II study, students' reactions to the wizard's Slack hints were mostly positive, though some hints were read without discussion — related
- Flexible design with a human wizard anticipated kindergarteners' developing communication styles in robot-mediated interaction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
woz1-students-feedback-helpful |
title |
In WOZ I, students reported the cognitive-model-based wizard feedback as helpful for understanding and solving robotics problems |
description |
In WOZ I, students reported the cognitive-model-based wizard feedback as helpful for understanding and solving robotics problems |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sandra-schulz-bruce-m-mclaren-niels-pinkwart-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.