WOZ I wizards judged the four-layer cognitive model appropriate for supporting students during robotics tasks¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After the second and third WOZ I interventions, most wizards found the cognitive model appropriate for supporting students as described (N = 7). → Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart 2023

Evidence¶

Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart 2023¶

Sandra Schulz · Bruce M. McLaren · Niels Pinkwart. (2023). Towards a Tutoring System to Support Robotics Activities in Classrooms – Two Wizard-of-Oz Studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00305-2

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Group interviews with the five WOZ I wizards after each intervention lesson, coded qualitatively; approximately 40 statements were analyzed after interventions two and three. “Most wizards found that the cognitive model was appropriate to support students in the ways described” (N = 7).

"Most wizards found that the cognitive model was appropriate to support students in the ways described ( N = 7 )."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In the first WOZ I intervention, students' problems lay mostly in the software category, especially the programming environment — related
• In WOZ I, students reported the cognitive-model-based wizard feedback as helpful for understanding and solving robotics problems — related