Writing self-efficacy typically improves over a single academic term but fluctuates and drops when students enter new writing contexts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most pretest–posttest studies found statistically significant improvement in writing self-efficacy across a single term of study. → Kim M. Mitchell 2023
q2 i? Longitudinal studies with three or more time points consistently find writing self-efficacy fluctuates and drops at a third measurement point or when students move to a new course or writing context. → Kim M. Mitchell 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Kim M. Mitchell 2023¶
Kim M. Mitchell, Sharon Zumbrunn, Danielle N. Berry, Lisa Demczuk. (2023). Writing Self-Efficacy in Postsecondary Students: a Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09798-2
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's synthesis of the 20 studies (40%) assessing change over time reports significant pre-to-post improvement in most single-term studies; three studies did not reach significance and two found decreases from pre to post term.
"Most studies found that writing self-efficacy demonstrated statistically significant improvement in a context where writing self-efficacy scores were assessed at the beginning and the end of a single term of study"
Kim M. Mitchell 2023 (2)¶
Kim M. Mitchell, Sharon Zumbrunn, Danielle N. Berry, Lisa Demczuk. (2023). Writing Self-Efficacy in Postsecondary Students: a Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09798-2
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's synthesis of the four longitudinal studies with three or more time points reports improvement early on that flattened or declined by a third measurement; in one cohort, self-efficacy dropped significantly two years after a writing course ended before rising again.
"Rather than continuing to increase over time once a course ends, writing self-efficacy seems to consistently drop when students move into a new course or new writing context"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Argument structure training increased students' self-reported confidence with the Toulmin model — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
writing-self-efficacy-change-over-time |
title |
Writing self-efficacy typically improves over a single academic term but fluctuates and drops when students enter new writing contexts |
description |
Writing self-efficacy typically improves over a single academic term but fluctuates and drops when students enter new writing contexts |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2028 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — kim-m-mitchell-2023, kim-m-mitchell-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.