Claims

Writing self-efficacy increased significantly in both the Facebook experimental group and the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's writing self-efficacy rose from 3.30 to 3.81, a statistically significant increase. → Altunkaya and Topuzkanamis 2018

Evidence

Altunkaya and Topuzkanamis 2018

Hatice Altunkaya, Ersoy Topuzkanamış. (2018). The Effect of Using Facebook in Writing Education on Writing Achievement, Attitude, Anxiety and Self-efficacy Perception. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(10): 2133-2142. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061010

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Dependent samples t-test on the same scale for the control group (n=48) receiving paper-based instruction. The article reports a significant difference and concludes self-efficacy improved in the control group too.

"the control group writing self-efficacy pre-test mean score was 3.30, and the posttest mean score was 3.81. It was observed that there was a significant difference between these two scores [t(47) = 8.850; p < .05]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.