Claims

In year two, after a leadership shift toward high-stakes testing, student climate perceptions declined significantly below baseline across all five scale assets

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2015: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Student reporting showed significantly strong negative changes across all five scale assets after year two, dropping slightly below initial baseline measurements. → Nelson 2012

Evidence

Nelson 2012

Nelson, L. P., McMahan, S. K., & Torres, T. (2012). The Impact of a Junior High School Community Intervention Project: Moving Beyond the Testing Juggernaut and Into a Community of Creative Learners. School Community Journal, 22(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ974689

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Repeated-measures analysis at the intervention school (Table 1 reports F values such as 338.14 for Optimism '09, significant at p < .001). Year-two means fell below the 2007 baseline on all five scales; no effect sizes are printed.

"changes in student reporting across all five scale assets after year two of the in- tervention, dropping slightly below initial baseline measurements (Table 1 & Figure 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.