Elements

Feedback and feedforward typology for deliberate language practice

Element · All elements
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 2 studies (2 quant-synthesis), q4 · 2 of 2 report an effect size

Description

A core component of the framework is a differentiated account of feedback: depending on the learner's current task performance and linguistic proficiency, "feedback can be affirmatory (used to confirm a desired action or outcome), reformatory (used to correct an undesirable action or outcome), or developmentary (used to expand one’s knowledge or abilities)." Feedback should also distinguish performance errors from knowledge errors, be categorical, graded, or finely graded, target a narrow selection of errors to avoid cognitive overload, and be aligned to declarative and/or procedural memory systems. Feedforward complements feedback by presenting learners with information about upcoming learning steps and future tasks. Dynamic assessment is offered as a means of identifying gaps and delivering responsive feedback.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Affordances

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type element
id dp-feedback-feedforward-typology
title Feedback and feedforward typology for deliberate language practice
description A core component of the framework is a differentiated account of feedback: depending on the learner's current task performance and linguistic proficiency, "feedback can be affirmatory (used to confirm a desired action...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — joshua-wedlock-christopher-binnie-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.