Provide accessible guidelines, training materials, or workshops to help students understand responsible GenAI use¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description¶

To address the high uncertainty observed in the survey, the article recommends greater transparency about how GenAI tools may be used in academic work. It states "Institutions should consider developing accessible guidelines, training materials, or workshops that help students better understand how to use these technologies responsibly and in accordance with academic integrity principles." This complements the finding that formal regulations alone do not guide student behavior.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Institutional capacity to produce and communicate guidelines, training materials, or workshops

Constraints¶

• The article frames this as a response to uncertainty observed in one institution's programs; generalization beyond that context is cautioned

Target Learners¶

• undergraduate students in higher education

Target Learning Goals¶

• understanding institutional GenAI regulations
• responsible GenAI use aligned with academic integrity

Claims¶

• Awareness of institutional GenAI regulations does not automatically translate into clarity about rule-compliant use [+W]

Related Strategies¶

• Universities combine responsible AI use guidelines, accessible technical support, AI literacy training, and assessment-embedded critical evaluation activities to address AI learning anxiety
• Integrate discussions of acceptable GenAI use directly into courses, assignments, and assessment guidelines, with explicit examples of permitted and non-permitted uses
• Encourage students to use AI-generated responses while observing ethical guidelines
• Build ethical AI integration on four coordinated levels: faculty professional development, ethics curricula, clear institutional guidelines, and interdisciplinary updating
• Use metaphor workshops to surface stakeholder assumptions about GenAI in assessment redesign, policy development and professional development
• Develop student AI literacy and institutional GenAI policies, guidelines and safeguards for responsible integration
• Universities should provide vivid guidelines and education on how and where ChatGPT may be used for learning
• Provide institutional support: regular GenAI workshops, subsidized access to advanced tools, reliable resources, and curriculum inclusion

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Lasse Bischof, Eva-Maria Schön, Maria Rauschenberger, Michael Neumann. (2026). Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12436