Strategies

Apply an affective data governance framework: minimization, purpose limitation, consent, human oversight, and separation from evaluation

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

Whenever AI-supported teacher-development systems involve affective, behavioral, or socio-emotional data, the article prescribes a minimum governance framework: "Apply data minimization, purpose limitation, informed consent, opt-in/opt-out mechanisms, access controls, retention limits, human oversight, and contestability." Data gathered for wellbeing must not be repurposed for productivity monitoring, ranking, or performance evaluation, and algorithmic inferences about affective states should function only as provisional signals requiring contextual human interpretation.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id affective-data-governance-safeguards
title Apply an affective data governance framework: minimization, purpose limitation, consent, human oversight, and separation from evaluation
description Whenever AI-supported teacher-development systems involve affective, behavioral, or socio-emotional data, the article prescribes a minimum governance framework: "Apply data minimization, purpose limitation, informed c...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — aponte-ml-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.