Design self-explanation prompts aligned to target outcomes, favoring explanations of correct content¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 5 claims (2 for, 3 mixed) · 2 studies (2 review),q2· 0 of 2 report an effect size · 5 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article recommends that educators prompt self-explanation of content known to be correct, and additionally of why incorrect information is incorrect, rather than of learners' own potentially incorrect ideas. It further advises that "explanation prompts must be carefully designed to align with target learn-ing outcomes," since prompts direct attention to particular information and can draw effort away from other important information.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- The domain should be consistently guided by general principles or heuristics with few exceptions
- Prompt type should match the target learning outcome: why-prompts for conceptual knowledge, how-prompts for procedural transfer
Constraints¶
- Self-explanation of learners' own ideas is inadvisable unless problems are usually solved correctly or accuracy feedback is provided first
Target Learners¶
- students from preschool through adulthood learning principle-guided material
Target Learning Goals¶
- comprehension
- transfer of principles and procedures
Affordances¶
- Four Constraints Self Explanation Effectiveness Framework
Claims¶
- Explaining one's own potentially incorrect ideas can reduce learning, while explaining known-correct content supports it [+M]
- Explanation prompts direct attention to targeted information and can reduce attention to other important information [~M]
- Self-explanation beats unguided studying for equal time, but instructional explanations, problem solving and retrieval practice can be equally or more effective [~M]
- Self-explanation promotes transfer of general patterns but can reduce recall of details and cause overgeneralization [~M]
- Students who self-explain worked examples learn more effectively than those who do not, and the quality of self-explanations relates to explaining deep structure [+W]
Related Strategies¶
- Clear Structure
- Consider alternatives to self-explanation — instructional explanations, sequenced problem solving, retrieval practice — given its time demands
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr. (2017). Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
align-self-explanation-prompts-with-target-outcomes |
title |
Design self-explanation prompts aligned to target outcomes, favoring explanations of correct content |
description |
The article recommends that educators prompt self-explanation of content known to be correct, and additionally of why incorrect information is incorrect, rather than of learners' own potentially incorrect ideas. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bethany-rittle-johnson-abbey-m-loehr-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.