Design AI-integration activities that set explicit expectations for AI-assisted work, integrate reflective assessments of AI outputs, and build tasks strengthening critical thinking and academic integrity¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

This strategy packages the article's three named activity types for integrating generative AI into an academic writing course. The article states: "These activities include setting explicit expectations for AI-assisted work, integrating reflective assessments to evaluate AI outputs, and designing tasks that strengthen students' critical thinking and academic integrity." The activities were designed to encourage reflective practices, promote critical analysis of AI-generated content, and establish clear guidelines for responsible use.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Clear guidelines for responsible AI use must be established alongside the activities

Constraints¶

Target Learners¶

• higher education students in an English course for Academic and Professional Communication

Target Learning Goals¶

• critical thinking
• academic integrity
• critical analysis of AI-generated content

Affordances¶

• Critical Digital Pedagogy Ai Engagement

Related Strategies¶

• Scaffolded AI integration with teacher training and reflective tasks to reduce over-reliance
• Embed explicit AI-integrity practices such as ethics lessons, usage pledges, and AI-output marking into science instruction

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Benali Taouis, H., & Díaz García, A. (2026). Teaching with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Ethical Awareness in Academic Writing. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.53761/28y4hw95