Future flipped-classroom research should be well-designed, sufficiently powered RCTs with low risk of bias reported per CONSORT¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 quant-synthesis), q3 · 1 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description¶

Based on the low certainty of evidence for both academic performance and satisfaction, the review recommends that "Future well‐designed sufficiently powered RCTs with low risk of bias that report according to the CONSORT guidelines are needed." This is the review's forward-looking research recommendation for decision-makers and researchers in health professional education.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Trials must be sufficiently powered, at low risk of bias, and reported according to CONSORT guidelines

Constraints¶

• The current evidence base consists mostly of non-randomised designs with high risk of bias

Target Learners¶

• undergraduate health professional students

Target Learning Goals¶

• academic performance
• student satisfaction

Claims¶

• Undergraduate health professional students report more positive satisfaction with flipped class learning than with traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48), at low certainty [+W]

Related Strategies¶

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Naing, C., Whittaker, M. A., Aung, H. H., Chellappan, D. K., & Riegelman, A. (2023). The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19, e1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1339