Strategies

Future adult literacy research should examine neglected higher-order skills and test reader demographics as moderators

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 6 claims (6 for) · 1 study (1 quant-synthesis), q3 · 1 of 1 report an effect size · 6 claims rest on one study

Description

The authors identify gaps for future work: comprehension monitoring, verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory are "either minimally studied (i.e., working memory) or neglected entirely from the adult literacy research," and the large heterogeneity in effect sizes calls for studies testing "reader demographics and study characteristics as moderators of the strength of the various predictor-reading comprehension effect sizes."

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id future-research-higher-order-skills-moderators-adult-literacy
title Future adult literacy research should examine neglected higher-order skills and test reader demographics as moderators
description The authors identify gaps for future work: comprehension monitoring, verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory are "either minimally studied (i.e., working memory) or neglected entirely from the adult...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tighe-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.