Strategies

Design considerations for a future rigorous evaluation of no-deadlines approaches

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 causal), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The memo recommends five areas for a future evaluation: enhancing the synthetic controls (more predictive covariates, cross-directorate multi-unit analyses), reconsidering analytic decisions (annual versus quarterly intervals, thresholds for mid-year switchers, PI anticipation of NDL via Dear Colleague letters), resolving data issues (close-date accuracy, program linkages, partial-NDL programs like CISE), weighing an RCT in which NSF "could randomly select a subset of programs that have not yet implemented NDL," and adding outcomes such as portfolio diversity and staff workload measures.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id future-rigorous-ndl-evaluation-considerations
title Design considerations for a future rigorous evaluation of no-deadlines approaches
description The memo recommends five areas for a future evaluation: enhancing the synthetic controls (more predictive covariates, cross-directorate multi-unit analyses), reconsidering analytic decisions (annual versus quarterly i...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fesler-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.