Design considerations for a future rigorous evaluation of no-deadlines approaches¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 causal),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The memo recommends five areas for a future evaluation: enhancing the synthetic controls (more predictive covariates, cross-directorate multi-unit analyses), reconsidering analytic decisions (annual versus quarterly intervals, thresholds for mid-year switchers, PI anticipation of NDL via Dear Colleague letters), resolving data issues (close-date accuracy, program linkages, partial-NDL programs like CISE), weighing an RCT in which NSF "could randomly select a subset of programs that have not yet implemented NDL," and adding outcomes such as portfolio diversity and staff workload measures.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- A feasibility study of deadline frequency across programs before moving to finer time intervals
- Collaboration with NSF to refine comparison-program lists and program linkages
Constraints¶
- An RCT would require waiting several years for impacts and may require randomizing a relatively large number of programs; programs may prefer to choose whether and when to implement NDL
- Including all programs across directorates as comparisons led to poor matches
Target Learners¶
- NSF Evaluation and Assessment Capability staff and future evaluation teams
Target Learning Goals¶
- Rigorous estimation of no-deadlines policy impacts on proposal volume, quality, burden, collaboration, and funding requests
Claims¶
- In exploratory synthetic control analyses, two GEO no-deadlines programs received 120 to 130 fewer proposals relative to their synthetic counterfactuals [+W]
- Synthetic control counterfactuals performed poorly for BIO NDL programs because few comparison programs were available [~W]
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Fesler, Lily and Lindsay Fox. (2022). No-deadlines Synthetic Control and Exploratory Outcomes Analysis and Recommendations for a Future Rigorous Evaluation [Memorandum]. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/no-deadlines-synthetic-control-and-exploratory-outcomes-analysis-and-recommendations-for-a-future
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
future-rigorous-ndl-evaluation-considerations |
title |
Design considerations for a future rigorous evaluation of no-deadlines approaches |
description |
The memo recommends five areas for a future evaluation: enhancing the synthetic controls (more predictive covariates, cross-directorate multi-unit analyses), reconsidering analytic decisions (annual versus quarterly i... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fesler-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.