Extend this line of research with quantitative methods, different sample groups, and validated scales¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The article closes with forward-looking research recommendations for work on Web 2.0 tool use through the needs hierarchy. It recommends that "further studies can be realised with different research methods of quantitative research", that studies "can be realised with different sample groups and different stages" beyond faculty members, and that "Further studies can be realised with a valid and reliable scale or questionnaire" so that "detailed and comparative results can be produced."

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Follow-up studies need a valid and reliable scale or questionnaire to produce detailed and comparative results, per the article.

Constraints¶

• The present evidence base is a single-site qualitative case study of 20 academicians, which the article itself flags as a limit on generalisation.

Target Learners¶

• academicians in higher education
• other sample groups and stages named for future study

Target Learning Goals¶

• understanding Web 2.0 tool use through the needs hierarchy

Affordances¶

• Maslow 2 Digital Needs Pyramid

Related Strategies¶

• Call for combined quantitative and qualitative studies to identify which contexts favor explicit versus implicit grammar teaching

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• YILDIZ, Ezgi Pelin. (2021). Academist Perceptions on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools Through Maslow's Needs Hierarchy: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.1, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.185