Collaborate with local knowers and socially validate interpretations through community-based discourse¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 review), q1 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description¶

The article recommends that, within progressive ideologies such as standpoint epistemology and critical pragmatism, inquiry into valued thinking should involve scientists collaborating with "local knowers"—people with firsthand, often minoritized, experience. Together they "investigate potential solutions for concrete problems and socially validate their interpretations through community- based discourse where all voices are heard." This is the article's forward-looking implication for theory and practice surrounding valued forms of thinking.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Requires collaboration between scientists and local knowers with firsthand, often minoritized experiences

Constraints¶

• The article frames this within progressive ideologies as a possible future direction, not as an implemented practice

Target Learners¶

• minoritized community members and local knowers
• educational researchers

Target Learning Goals¶

• investigating solutions to concrete problems through socially validated, community-based knowing

Affordances¶

• Standpoint Epistemology Situated Knowledge
• Critical Pragmatism Experience Discourse

Claims¶

• Understandings of valued thinking have been dominated by the voices of White, predominantly male scholars [+W]

Related Strategies¶

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Murphy, P. Karen, Ogata, Tyler, & Schoute, Eric C. (2023). “Valued” thinking in education: Liberating the narrative. Educational Psychology Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09754-0