Strategies

Apply seventeen evidence-based design guidelines when developing formative assessment with analytic rubrics for complex skills

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 4 claims (1 for, 2 mixed, 1 against) · 2 studies (1 causal, 1 design), q1–q3 · 1 of 2 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

The article compiles seventeen guidelines for formative assessment with analytic rubrics, stating "Table 1 presents an overview of (seventeen) guidelines on analytic rubrics we encountered in literature. Guidelines 1–4 inform us how to use rubrics for formative assessment; Guidelines 5–17 inform us how to use rubrics for instruction, with Guidelines 5–9 on a rather generic, meso level and Guidelines 10–17 on a more specific, micro level." They cover preferring analytic over rating-scale rubrics, self- and peer-assessment, training teachers and students, authentic tasks of increasing complexity, modelling examples, rehearsal practice, high-quality feedback, and specific goal-setting. The study applied all seventeen in designing its classroom scenarios.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.