Use small-group discussion of a phenomenon-describing problem before text study to bridge prior knowledge and new information¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 5 claims (5 for) · 1 study (1 causal),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 5 claims rest on one study
Description¶
Small groups of learners are given a description of natural phenomena and asked to explain them in terms of underlying processes, principles, or mechanisms before reading a relevant expository text. The article concludes that "activation of prior knowledge through small-group discussion of a problem can be a successful instructional strategy for bridging the gap between what is already known or can be inferred about a subject and new information to be learned." An experimenter acts as chairperson, summarizing viewpoints without supplying information.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- A problem description of natural phenomena whose explanation requires the target concepts; a text presented only after the discussion; a chairperson who questions for clarification and summarizes without providing the underlying mechanisms
Constraints¶
- The procedure specifically supports recall of explanatory, not descriptive, information from the text; group-process contributions to learning were not investigated in the article
Target Learners¶
- secondary school and college students in science domains
Target Learning Goals¶
- acquisition of causal, explanatory concepts from expository text
Affordances¶
Claims¶
- While discussing a problem, learners actively construct situation-specific explanatory models from prior knowledge rather than merely reproducing what they know [+W]
- Novices and experts differ in problem representation: novices segment the problem and use surface analogies, while experts apply general underlying principles [+W]
- Analyzing a problem before reading facilitates subsequent recall of a relevant text for both novices and experts [+W]
- Problem analysis through small-group discussion particularly stimulates the production of explanatory propositions, via a significant treatment-by-proposition-type interaction [+W]
- The text-recall benefit of problem analysis is confined to explanatory propositions; descriptive facts are not better remembered [+W]
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory Models in the Processing of Science Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge Activation Through Small-Group Discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.4.610
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
small-group-problem-discussion-before-text |
title |
Use small-group discussion of a phenomenon-describing problem before text study to bridge prior knowledge and new information |
description |
Small groups of learners are given a description of natural phenomena and asked to explain them in terms of underlying processes, principles, or mechanisms before reading a relevant expository text. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schmidt-1989 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.