Standardise outcome measurements and isolate individual instructional design features in future research¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 review),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study
Description¶
The review's forward‐looking recommendation is that "future research should incorporate standardised outcome measurements to enable between study comparisons and directly isolate and compare instructional design features". It argues addressing these gaps and standardising methodologies will advance training, offer future recommendations and improve clinical practice and patient safety. It also notes a meta‐analysis may become feasible as randomised controlled trials accumulate.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Future studies must standardise outcome measurement and directly isolate instructional design features between groups
Constraints¶
- Meta‐analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of study design, outcomes, modalities, features and assessment methods
Target Learners¶
- healthcare providers training in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia
Target Learning Goals¶
- evidence‐based simulation curriculum design for regional anaesthesia
Claims¶
Related Strategies¶
- Use validated homogeneous outcome measures, preferably in a patient setting, in future FB SBT studies
- Future online-training trials should follow TIDieR reporting, match comparison arms on duration and content, use Kirkpatrick's outcome hierarchy, and run factorial experiments optimising online features
- Future research on professional reasoning in occupational therapy should target information processing, reasoning modalities, methodological quality assessment, and non-English-speaking contexts
- Develop standardised delivery-quality assessment using a maximum of two scores (one communication, one content-delivery)
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.