Theories

Biglan classification of academic disciplines as a framework for analyzing disciplinary variation in faculty work

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 mixed) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The Biglan classification characterizes academic disciplines along three dimensions: pure/applied (degree of concern with application of disciplinary knowledge), hard/soft (degree of paradigm consensus), and life/nonlife (whether the discipline concerns living organisms). This study is the first to use it as a conceptual framework for publicly engaged scholarship, assigning each faculty member's department a Biglan code and extending the classification to 40 departments that postdate Biglan's 1973 scheme. The article notes disciplines have evolved since 1973 and interdisciplinary scholarship poses a challenge to the classification.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Biglan classification of academic disciplines as a framework for analyzing disciplinary variation in faculty work
description The Biglan classification characterizes academic disciplines along three dimensions: pure/applied (degree of concern with application of disciplinary knowledge), hard/soft (degree of paradigm consensus), and life/nonl...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — doberneck-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.