Options framework for addressing co-teaching in value-added models¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 associational),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article organizes the policy problem of co-teaching in value-added models as a set of options available to policymakers, building on earlier work that described the Full Roster Method. It frames co-teachers as teams, "with each teacher receiving equal credit for co-taught students," and positions the Full Roster-Plus Method as an improvement that removes the extra weighting of co-taught students while keeping their full weight with each teacher. The framework serves as a guide for policymakers and developers of value-added models choosing how to account for co-teaching.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- A value-added model in which teachers are credited for their students' achievement, with data identifying which students are co-taught and by which teachers
Constraints¶
- The empirical evidence reported comes from a single district, District of Columbia Public Schools
Target Learners¶
- K-12 students in co-taught classrooms in public school districts
Target Learning Objectives¶
- Accurate estimation of individual teacher contributions to student achievement growth in value-added accountability systems
Claims¶
Related Theories¶
- Three-method framework for accounting for co-teaching in value-added models
- Four options for accounting for co-teaching in value-added models
Examples¶
Key Sources¶
- Eric Isenberg, Elias Walsh. (2015). Accounting for Co-Teaching: A Guide for Policymakers and Developers of Value-Added Models. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, vol. 8, issue 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/journal-article-accounting-for-coteachng-a-guide-for-policymakers-and-developers-of-valueadded
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
Options framework for addressing co-teaching in value-added models |
description |
The article organizes the policy problem of co-teaching in value-added models as a set of options available to policymakers, building on earlier work that described the Full Roster Method. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — eric-isenberg-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.