Theories

Options framework for addressing co-teaching in value-added models

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The article organizes the policy problem of co-teaching in value-added models as a set of options available to policymakers, building on earlier work that described the Full Roster Method. It frames co-teachers as teams, "with each teacher receiving equal credit for co-taught students," and positions the Full Roster-Plus Method as an improvement that removes the extra weighting of co-taught students while keeping their full weight with each teacher. The framework serves as a guide for policymakers and developers of value-added models choosing how to account for co-teaching.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Options framework for addressing co-teaching in value-added models
description The article organizes the policy problem of co-teaching in value-added models as a set of options available to policymakers, building on earlier work that described the Full Roster Method.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — eric-isenberg-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.