Theories

Differentiated knowledge measures framework: static/dynamic, modality, and quality categories

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 1 study (1 causal), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The article proposes that multimedia learning effects should be evaluated with knowledge measures differentiated along three categories. As printed: "We defined three knowledge categories: static/dynamic (process or facts knowledge), modality (verbal or visual knowledge), and quality (passive or active knowledge)." Static/dynamic distinguishes facts (objects, events, symbols) from processes (flows of interdependent causalities); modality derives from dual coding theory's separate verbal and visual channels; quality contrasts active (production/reconstruction) with passive (recognition) knowledge. The framework let the study show that media effects differ by knowledge category rather than being uniform.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Differentiated knowledge measures framework: static/dynamic, modality, and quality categories
description The article proposes that multimedia learning effects should be evaluated with knowledge measures differentiated along three categories.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — guttormsen-schär-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.