Discovery learning defined by two identifying characteristics: induction and errorful learning¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 mixed) · 1 study (1 theoretical),q1· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study
Description¶
Glaser's conceptual framework decomposes the label "discovery learning" into two analyzable processes. First, induction: giving exemplars of a general case so the learner induces the general proposition, assessed by verbalization, application, or generating new exemplars. Second, errorful learning: because a discovery sequence minimizes imposed structure, "Discovering" implies a low probability of making a successful response, so errors are highly probable. He also distinguishes learning BY discovery (teaching objectives via a discovery method) from learning TO discover (teaching the ability to make discoveries).
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Analysis of the terminal behavior and task properties must precede decisions about using discovery sequences
Constraints¶
- The framework applies to learning-by-discovery sequences as labeled in the reviewed literature; learning-to-discover is treated separately as poorly understood
Target Learners¶
- school children in curriculum development contexts
Target Learning Objectives¶
- concepts, rules, and generalizations taught by discovery methods
Claims¶
- Self-discovery through errorful exploration is basically incompatible with error minimization in instruction [~W]
- The usefulness of induction and errorful learning varies with the type of terminal task being taught [~W]
- Errorless discrimination training avoids emotional responses and yields more effective transfer than errorful training (Terrace's pigeon studies) [~W]
Related Theories¶
Examples¶
Key Sources¶
- Glaser, Robert. (1966). Variables in "Discovery Learning." Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED010518
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
Discovery learning defined by two identifying characteristics: induction and errorful learning |
description |
Glaser's conceptual framework decomposes the label "discovery learning" into two analyzable processes. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — glaser-1966 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.