Theories

Functional-relations typology: logical, pragmatic, and pure consonance, with dissonance as a post-functional unstable state

Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The paper translates Festinger's system of cognitive relations into functional terms, defining types of consonance among neuronal elements. Logical consonance means activation of one element always leads to activation of another; pragmatic and pure consonance are multiple-source dependent, requiring contributions from other sources. The authors argue "disson4ndeis a post-functional phenomenon", arising only when elements compete for simultaneous functioning, and that "Multiple-Source dependence inevitably results,at some time or other,in dissonance".

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Functional-relations typology: logical, pragmatic, and pure consonance, with dissonance as a post-functional unstable state
description The paper translates Festinger's system of cognitive relations into functional terms, defining types of consonance among neuronal elements.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — iran-nejad-1982

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.