Theories

Goal-Action-Outcome frame: explanations of many historical events have a generic structure of goal, action, and outcome

Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The analysis of Why-Action explanation questions rests on a generic structure attributed to Armbruster and Anderson (1982): "explanations of many historical events have a generic structure consisting of three causally related categories of information" — Goal, Action, and Outcome. The Goal is the desired state sought by an individual or group, the Action is the overt behavior undertaken to accomplish the Goal, and the Outcome is the consequence of the Action. In questions of this type, the Action and/or Outcome is the effect given in the question and the Goal is the cause required in the answer.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Goal-Action-Outcome frame: explanations of many historical events have a generic structure of goal, action, and outcome
description The analysis of Why-Action explanation questions rests on a generic structure attributed to Armbruster and Anderson (1982): "explanations of many historical events have a generic structure consisting of three causally...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — armbruster-1984

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.