Theories

Interpersonal complementarity principle (Leary Circumplex / Carson)

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The article organizes its hypotheses around the complementarity principle from the Leary Interpersonal Circumplex: high-probability elicitation-response sequences (dominance followed by submissiveness, submissiveness followed by dominance, friendliness followed by friendliness, hostility followed by hostility) are labeled complementary. Carson "purposes that their frequency is related to the fact that such complementary interactions are reinforcing to both participants, contribute to the maintenance of existing behavior patterns, reduce C'' ety, and promote increased relatedness." Conversely, anti-complementary exchanges purportedly generate anxiety and are behaviorally disconfirming. The study tests competing predictions: Carson's view that therapists should avoid complementarity to the client's maladjusted elicitations versus Swensen's view that highly complementary relationships are most successful.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Interpersonal complementarity principle (Leary Circumplex / Carson)
description The article organizes its hypotheses around the complementarity principle from the Leary Interpersonal Circumplex: high-probability elicitation-response sequences (dominance followed by submissiveness, submissiveness...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dietzel-1974

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.