Theories

Principle of likely need versus principle of repetition as competing accounts of lexical learning

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 review), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The chapter contrasts two learning principles underlying lexical organization. The principle of repetition holds that repeating a word increases its memory strength; the principle of likely need, from rational models of memory, holds that a word experienced in many distinct contexts is more broadly accessible because it is more likely to be needed in an unknown future context. The chapter states that "A word that has been experienced in many contexts during learning is more likely to be needed in an unknown future context, making it more broadly accessible in the lexicon." The two principles make different item-specific predictions about words repeated within versus across contexts.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Principle of likely need versus principle of repetition as competing accounts of lexical learning
description The chapter contrasts two learning principles underlying lexical organization.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jones-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.