Taxonomy of four calibration and scoring approaches for multi-timepoint survey measures¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 2 studies (1 causal, 1 associational),q2· 0 of 2 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article organizes scoring options for repeated survey administration into four approaches ordered by complexity: (1) cross-sectional IRT calibration with a unidimensional model using a single timepoint, (2) longitudinal unidimensional calibration pooling all timepoints, (3) longitudinal multidimensional IRT (MIRT) calibration with latent variables for each timepoint, and (4) a two-tier MIRT adding specific factors for serial correlation from repeated items. The article frames the core choice: "whether to use an IRT model that calibrates based on a single timepoint versus a MIRT model that includes latent variables for scores at all timepoints." Unlike Approaches 1 and 2, the MIRT approach explicitly accounts for over-time correlations.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Item responses from the same Likert-type items administered across multiple timepoints
- Specification of calibration sample, IRT model type, and scoring method (e.g., EAP)
Constraints¶
- The two-tier approach does not model serial correlation due to each item being administered repeatedly across timepoints in Approach 3's formulation; Approach 1 assumes items function similarly across ages
Target Learners¶
- elementary and middle school students surveyed on psychological and social-emotional constructs
Target Learning Objectives¶
- accurate estimation of student growth trajectories on latent psychological and social-emotional constructs
Claims¶
- Multidimensional IRT scores that account for latent variable covariances over time produce better recovery of growth parameters in longitudinal growth models than sum scores and other IRT approaches [+W]
- Response styles can affect estimates of growth parameters, including the slope, on social-emotional survey constructs [~W]
Related Theories¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Kuhfeld, Megan, and James Soland. (2020). Estimating Student Growth on Psychological and Social-emotional Constructs: A Comparison of Multiple Scoring Approaches. EdWorkingPaper No. 20-193. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai20-193
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
Taxonomy of four calibration and scoring approaches for multi-timepoint survey measures |
description |
The article organizes scoring options for repeated survey administration into four approaches ordered by complexity: (1) cross-sectional IRT calibration with a unidimensional model using a single timepoint, (2) longit... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kuhfeld-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.