Theories

Taxonomy of four calibration and scoring approaches for multi-timepoint survey measures

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 2 studies (1 causal, 1 associational), q2 · 0 of 2 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

The article organizes scoring options for repeated survey administration into four approaches ordered by complexity: (1) cross-sectional IRT calibration with a unidimensional model using a single timepoint, (2) longitudinal unidimensional calibration pooling all timepoints, (3) longitudinal multidimensional IRT (MIRT) calibration with latent variables for each timepoint, and (4) a two-tier MIRT adding specific factors for serial correlation from repeated items. The article frames the core choice: "whether to use an IRT model that calibrates based on a single timepoint versus a MIRT model that includes latent variables for scores at all timepoints." Unlike Approaches 1 and 2, the MIRT approach explicitly accounts for over-time correlations.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Taxonomy of four calibration and scoring approaches for multi-timepoint survey measures
description The article organizes scoring options for repeated survey administration into four approaches ordered by complexity: (1) cross-sectional IRT calibration with a unidimensional model using a single timepoint, (2) longit...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kuhfeld-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.