Theories

Mead's taxonomy of post-figurative, co-figurative, and pre-figurative cultures explains how accelerating change reverses the direction of learning

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 2 studies (1 review, 1 theoretical), q1 · 0 of 2 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The report presents Mead's three-part cultural taxonomy for characterizing how knowledge passes between generations. In post-figurative cultures children learn from adults as models of the future; in co-figurative cultures peers learn from peers; in pre-figurative culture, which Mead dated to around 1969, "the elders had to learn how to incorporate what the young had learned but which they had not." The report presents this as Mead's account of a generation gap unique in involving the whole world, introducing a new element into education.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Mead's taxonomy of post-figurative, co-figurative, and pre-figurative cultures explains how accelerating change reverses the direction of learning
description The report presents Mead's three-part cultural taxonomy for characterizing how knowledge passes between generations.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — monroe-1992

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.