Theories

Montclair conception of critical thinking as judgment supported by disciplinary canons

Theory · All theories
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The Institute for Critical Thinking at Montclair State College defines critical thinking through its concern with judgment: students should see course content within a nexus of justification and application, learning content in relation to the methodological and substantive principles that make it justifiable. The editors state that 'critical thinking constitutes the ability and willingness to identify and apply the set of principles that support judgment through the best available reasons,' with those reasons typically found in the canons of the disciplines. The account builds on the editors' attribution to Matthew Lipman of an analysis in which critical thinking rests on criteria for judgment applied with sensitivity to context and a commitment to self-correction.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Montclair conception of critical thinking as judgment supported by disciplinary canons
description The Institute for Critical Thinking at Montclair State College defines critical thinking through its concern with judgment: students should see course content within a nexus of justification and application, learning...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — weinstein-1989

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.